Liz goes to GA
I'm going to Minneapolis, Minnesota from July 1-10 to represent the Utica Presbytery as a Young Adult Advisory Delagate (YAAD) to the 219th Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) General Assembly. So here's where I write about it!
Saturday, July 10, 2010
A Happy Ending.
Protesters Disrupt Business Meeting!
The excitement of today’s plenary occurred around 5:00pm when a group of protesters (not affiliated with the Presbyterian Church) came into the auditorium and interrupted our business meeting. The moderator was notified of their presence when they had entered the section of the auditorium reserved for commissioners and advisory delegates only, refusing to leave. In response, the moderator called for a recess and asked us to stand and join together in singing a hymn. As we began to sing, the protesters walked down the right aisle towards the stage, carrying signs which read “Prayer: Ordinance, Marriage, Pensions.” Large news cameras followed the procession, and the officials on stage looked on in confusion. Everyone strained to discern what the signs said, and a sense of uneasiness overtook the hall. The hymn ended and the room fell quiet as those in the room looked on in confusion at the group of protesters who had now lined up in a row on the stage. Amid the shifting and whispering, a small voice began to sing. The rest of the protesters gradually joined the voice in a song about prayer, and everyone stood to listen.
The moderator advised us to get up and walk about in recess, therefore ignoring the protesters who had interrupted the meeting and caught the attention of everyone in the room. No one really knew how to react as the people on stage continued to sing, holding their signs above their heads for all of us to see. Observers from the bleachers booed the protesters and delegates on the floor approached the stage with cameras. Police then entered the auditorium, asking the protestors to leave. Several resisted and were arrested, stirring alarm and confusion throughout the hall. Groups of people gathered together immediately to gather in prayer and reflect on what had just happened.
The recent debate over gay rights has caused immense tension throughout the General Assembly and the thought of a possible split in the church is terrifying to those who have loved the Presbyterian Church their entire life. Almost everyone at this assembly has a strong opinion on the subject of gay rights and cannot enter debate with a truly open mind. Trying to find compromises on an issue with such polarized viewpoints is nearly impossible. This controversy will not be resolved easily, and the news attention which the issue is receiving is only one indication of its extreme importance to the Presbyterian denomination as a whole.
Thursday, July 8, 2010
YAADs Beat the System FTW
With too much time spent debating the same item of business, it becomes easier and easier to tune the speakers out. Staying focused and alert gets increasingly difficult as the day goes by!
The conference hall has no internet access; we are only granted access to the PC-Biz website where all items of business are posted. This restriction of internet access was probably instilled to keep kids (and adults) off facebook and encourage delegates to pay attention to action on the floor. As most will agree, young people have relatively short attention spans (side note: I’ve seen an equal number of YAADs and adult commissioners playing solitaire on their computers today…just saying). Being the creative and tech-savvy young people that we are, the YAADs quickly developed a method of communicating with each other without the availability of internet access which our generation has grown so dependent on.
Check this out.
On the PC-Biz website, there is a service called “Session-Sync” which syncs the user with the current item of business being discussed on the floor. When the current item is displayed, there is a teeny-tiny button in the right-hand corner which says “Notes,” where a user can jot down notes of importance pertaining to the business on the floor. This device exists simply for personal use; no other user can see these notes.
It is possible, however, for several individuals to log on to one account simultaneously. Once logged on, a person can leave a note which everyone else logged onto that same account can see as well. Tory has offered his account up for use by the YAADs, which means any YAAD who would like to participate in this “chat” must sign onto PC-Biz using Tory’s username and password. Once logged on, users can leave “Notes” in a simple format: [name: message]. Tory cleverly changed the name on his account from Tory Kaspar to John Calvin. Ha.
So why am I broadcasting to the world that we used our sneaky computer skills to beat the system? This ongoing chat has actually been helpful in keeping the YAADs informed of the current business on the floor. General Assembly addresses a huge amount of business each time it convenes. Assuming that all 173 of us have had the time or patience to read through every single overture presented to the 219th GA is simply unrealistic. Most of the YAADs did their fair share of reading in preparing for their individual committees, but did not read through the overtures from other committees in depth. My committee alone had over 30 items of business to discuss. That’s a lot of reading!
The ongoing chat gives YAADs who have served on a specific committee the opportunity to inform other YAADs of the basics regarding business on the floor. The YAADs can give their opinions on the current item of business and bring up points from previous discussion in their committees which the other YAADs were not able to hear. The chat has been extremely helpful and I think the adult commissioners would be impressed if they were to look at these conversations. Instead of engaging in frivolous banter, the majority of the messages are addressed directly to the business on the floor, keeping all participating YAADs focused and informed of ongoing actions.
Props to the YAADs for being awesome…now it’s back to the floor for some intense debate!
And by intense, I mean intense. We just spent an hour and 45 minutes debating a motion which would potentially allow members of the LGBT community to serve as ordained ministers in the Presbyterian Church:
Shall G-6.0106b be amended by striking the current text and inserting new text in its place: [Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to be added or inserted is shown as italic.]
“b. Those who are called to office in the church are to lead a life in obedience to Scripture and in conformity to the historic confessional standards of the church. Among these standards is the requirement to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman (W-4.9001), or chastity in singleness. Persons refusing to repent of any self-acknowledged practice which the confessions call sin shall not be ordained and/or installed as deacons, elders, or ministers of the Word and Sacrament. Standards for ordained service reflect the church’s desire to submit joyfully to the Lordship of Jesus Christ in all aspects of life (G-1.0000). The governing body responsible for ordination and/or installation (G.14.0240; G-14.0450) shall examine each candidate’s calling, gifts, preparation, and suitability for the responsibilities of office. The examination shall include, but not be limited to, a determination of the candidate’s ability and commitment to fulfill all requirements as expressed in the constitutional questions for ordination and installation (W-4.4003). Governing bodies shall be guided by Scripture and the confessions in applying standards to individual candidates.”
Debate over this issue was the most heated and passionate I have ever seen, and one commissioner declared that he and his family would leave the Presbyterian Church if the motion passed (this delegate was also a candidate for vice moderator of the General Assembly, if that’s saying anything). Katie jumped at the opportunity to represent the Utica Presbytery and expressed her views on the issue by speaking for the motion.
After nearly two hours of growing tension, we finally bowed our heads for a minute of silent prayer in preparation for a vote which could dramatically redefine ordination standards. The motion passed 53%-46%, and the results were met with a room full of silence.
At the moderator’s suggestion, we all stood together to join in singing “Blessed Be the Tie That Binds,” a song I personally associate with the conclusion of Sunday School each week as a kid:
Blessed be the tie that binds
Our hearts in Christian love;
The fellowship of kindred minds
Is like to that above
For the first time, I really listened to the words of the song as something more than the weekly repetition of a classic hymn. As hundreds of voices sang together, I noted the lyrics’ symbolism of the unity our denomination must embrace in order to survive and function in an ever-changing and reforming world. I hope and pray that we can work together towards achieving the unity which everyone seems to be so focused on attaining, instead of just talking about it all the time.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Eating and Hugging and Such
At 8:30, I walked over to the Westminster Presbyterian Church for the Ecumenical Service of Worship & Holy Communion. What a beautiful building! The stone exterior is just as grand as the interior, artistically ornamented with colorful stained-glass windows, intricate wood carvings, and a full pipe organ at the front of the sanctuary. The church was packed and the service included special music from the Minnesota Boys Choir and various other musical groups selected to represent different cultures. We sang music and heard scriptures read in several different languages: Korean, Spanish, German, and French, among others. The service highlighted our diversity as an all-inclusive denomination as well as the importance of unity.
After morning worship, I went to Panera with Annie to meet up with some other YAADs and use our trusty debit cards for Frozen Caramels. Sitting outside, we took full advantage of Panera’s outdoor patio (which is ideal for summer!). Since this was one of our only “free” mornings, we ate leisurely and later strolled over to Target to purchase some essentials. As visitors to Minneapolis, we found the two-story Target absolutely fascinating, especially the escalators designed for carts! In exploring the store, we found Kenny in the luggage section, buying a suitcase to use as extra storage for everything he has accumulated over the past week…probably a wise purchase to comply with the mysterious increase in “swag” which will accompany us on our flights back home. I hope my suitcase doesn’t go over the weight limit for my flight back!
For the first half hour of plenary, we relearned how to use our voting pads, practicing on plenty of fun questions unrelated to the assembly. The first question asked, “Have you hugged a Presbyterian today?” I racked my brain for any instance of hugging this morning…no hugging at breakfast, no hugging at lunch, no hugging my roommate or Janet or Katie. To my disappointment, I was forced to vote “No.” Luckily, the YAAD who sits to my right, Taylor, came to the rescue and hugged me just in time for me to change my answer to “Yes.” It was a close call, but I emerged from the vote a friendly and extroverted Presbyterian. When the commissioners were polled, 68% answered “Yes,” to which Madame Moderator responded, “Well, it looks like 32% of us are introverts.”
I’m hoping the fact that I randomly received voting pad #1 will serve as some sort of a good omen and we’ll get out of plenary early tonight. We already broke an hour early for dinner, so that's a good sign! Now for dinner with the Presbytery, plenary till late and a YAAD gathering after that.
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Supermall.
Success!
AI...my new BFF
Authoritative Interpretation (AI)- an interpretation of The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) that carries the authority of the General Assembly and is binding on the governing bodies of the church.Harry Young warned me about the overabundance of AIs which I would be dealing with in committee and he even gave me a printout with the definition of Authoritative Interpretation before leaving home...I had no idea what I was in for.
Are you lost yet? This is the least of it. At one point we were voting on whether or not to vote on disapproving the recommendation to recommend the approval of the amendment to the overture to the General Assembly. Trying to figure out what exactly I was voting for often seemed like some convoluted logic problem...
The Advisory Committee on the Constitution recommends that the 219th General Assembly (2010) answer the question with the following authoritative interpretation, adopted in 1991, of G-9.0105a(5)regarding “youth”:
“Different age groups are persons who are unlike each other due to the different stages of life they represent, such as youth, adulthood, or old age. In order to assure greater inclusiveness in the church, persons from all different age groups are needed. The age groups and ages they contain are as follows: Youth—25 and under; Young Adults—26–35; Adults—36–55; Senior Adults—56 and up” (Minutes, 1991, Part I, p. 402).
This stirred great controversy among the YAADs, since we are considered YOUNG ADULT advisory delegates and not YOUTH delegates, bringing forth some inconsistency in how our age group is defined. Tory and I drafted several motions before he finally presented one which would create five categories:
- Youth- 18+under
- Young Adults- 19-25
- Middle Adults- 26-45
- Upper Adults- 46-64
- Senior Adults- 65+up
We figured these categories made a little more sense so 25-year-olds weren't grouped with 5-year-olds and the term "Young Adult" would remain consistent with the "Young Adult Advisory Delegates." Well either way, the motion failed, so I'm still considered a youth. Oh well. Another commissioner (not a YAAD) presented a similar motion and that failed, too. Another loss for the YAADs.
What else...
-The commissioners from South Dakota Presbytery, Washington Presbytery and New Covenant Presbytery are all supercool.
-Beatles music was blasting from the room connected to ours at one point.
-After committee let out a half hour late, we got to go to a YAAD gathering for several hours and pretend that we still had energy.
-At one point we voted down a motion to disapprove a recommendation, then subsequently voted down a motion to approve the same recommendation, then had to vote on whether or not we wanted to reconsider the first motion, then voted to reconsider the first motion, then voted in favor of disapproving the original recommendation. Yay for hours of redundant discussion!